Douglas ([info]beagley) wrote,
@ 2008-09-10 11:25:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Why You Don’t Need to Be Depressed that John McCain is Our Next President
Why You Don’t Need to Be Depressed that John McCain is Our Next President

The latest polls rank the candidates neck and neck, or with McCain pulling a slight lead. On top of that, I believe that polls (and the media) traditionally sway Democratic. I believe in closeted racism. I remember how voter registration problems ganked Florida in 2000. I remember that half the country voted for the worst president in history twice, and I know that McCain is a stronger candidate than Bush ever was.

I’ve said it before and I’ll stop saying it now: Obama is a long shot.

But I’ve decided I’m okay with that.

I believe that truth will out and good will triumph. I believe that the human race is evolving socially. I believe that in the next two or three hundred years, we are going to find a new way to exist as humans and a new way to relate to one another. Change may not happen as soon as I would like, but it will happen. It is already happening.

And there is no guarantee that Barack Obama would help that change better than John McCain would. Oh, sure, Obama seems like a more moral man, a man with stronger principles. He seems less likely to turn to war and death as a solution to our nation’s fear. He seems more likely to entertain innovative and game-changing solutions to our ongoing problems. To me, the vote is obvious, and his candidacy has filled me with hope.

But the changes we need don’t happen because one man encourages them. The shepherd guides the sheep, but even he can’t make them grow wool any faster.

One grumpy man can not stand in the way of progress, either. No matter how terrible a leader is, he can not alter humanity’s destiny. Only humanity can do that.

Here’s my resolution. It isn’t new or special, I’ve been grinding on it for some time, but it is the last shred of hope I hold onto for my country, given Obama’s slim chances of being elected:

Politicians are not going to save, or damn, the human race.


Maybe It Doesn't Matter as Much as We Think


Our leaders are a reflection of ourselves. These two candidates, all of Washington, even your boss and his bad habits... all of them simply reflect who and what we are. Bush is a lazy, impulsive, cowardly president, and I believe he was elected because 50% of the time we are lazy, impulsive, and cowardly.

In 2000, we were lazy. In 2004, we were very frightened. So (about) half of us voted for the laziest man who waved the biggest fear stick. Until we rise above that, our leaders will not improve. Don't just look at the isolationists, the intolerant, the red states-- look at the parts of yourself that carry this problem. You can't change the minds of FOX news. The only mind you can change is your own.

Rising above fear doesn’t just mean ending the war on terror by refusing to be terrorized, though that would be a start. Rising above fear means loving our enemies. And I’m talking about Ed in the next cubicle, not an Iranian, though the same principle applies.


Maybe Love is the Answer


The same impulse which gives you road rage, or makes you detest your neighbor for habits that are not all that worse than yours, is the same impulse that put George Bush in office. If we want change, if we never want to see another George Bush in office, we should vote for Obama, certainly. But that’s only a tiny piece of humanity’s puzzle. If you want real change, mow your neighbors lawn for him. And forgive your colleague for failing to respect your PowerPoint presentation. Look within yourself with honesty, forgive yourself for your failure to love, and then change.

Here’s the kicker: McCain would make a better president than George Bush ever could. If he brings his A-game. If he stops pandering. If he makes moral decisions. (And he’s capable of making moral decisions. I will never believe Bush capable of choosing lunch, let along leading our country.) But more importantly: even under McCain, we American citizens can make a better populace than George Bush was ever given to lead, if we bring our A-game.

We are the ones who will change things, not Johnny or Barack. We are the ones who need to stop squandering, stop sitting on our asses, and stop letting fear dominate our decision making.

I believe a change in leadership could help us, I really do.

But no matter who is elected, I know deep down that Barack is just one man. The rest is up to me and my fellow 300 million American citizens... and my fellow 6.7 billion global citizens.



(Post a new comment)

well said
[info]talazia
2008-09-10 03:31 pm UTC (link)
If people could just do one thing to make the world a better place - bike to work, clean up trash on weekends, stop using harmful chemicals on lawns, donate a dollar to the homeless, consume less, we'd all be in much better shape.

If you look at nonpartisan web sites that show voting records for mccain and obama, they have VERY similar leanings. I think the both of them went off the deep end for the VP pick, but still. McCain has always been one of those republicans I've liked for personal issues. He seems like the kind of guy that wouldn't let any namby-pamby go on :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: well said
[info]beagley
2008-09-10 03:35 pm UTC (link)
I liked McCain okay in 2000, I don't any more. His arguments no longer seem reasonable to me.

But yeah, my thesis is that the leader is not irrelevant, but our citizenship nationally is far more relevant. That's my stump speech, I think. :-)

kudos,
d

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]wej12
2008-09-11 08:40 pm UTC (link)
In principle, in the broadest sense, I agree with much of what you say. But two words make all the difference for me: Supreme Court.

The next president will appoint two or three justices, mostly as replacements for liberal incumbents. The next president, almost entirely by himself through high-court appointments, will decide the future of abortion rights, gay marriage, privacy rights, the permissibility of torture, right-to-counsel issues, workers' rights, gun rights, women's rights, immigration, etc. -- the major issues of our age, and ones that will resonate for a half century or longer.

In that way, Obama or McCain will make a tremendous difference in the lives of each and every American, its immigrants, and even its captured enemies. McCain's appointments to the high court, if they are anything like his pick for vice president, would roll this country back at least 30 years in terms of progressiveness.

This election matters a great deal.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]beagley
2008-09-11 08:53 pm UTC (link)
Yah... we've tussled over that one before.

I think, for me, that I stand behind my principle, even when it gets ugly.

In other words, the Supreme Court makes judgements that reflect what kind of a culture we are. We'd like to blame/thank them for *shaping* our culture, but the decisions they make come along because we are ready for them. We were ready for Brown vs. Board of Education. We were ready for Roe vs. Wade. Just barely, but we were. If we "roll back", as you say, then that will be part of the natural order of things. It will illustrate that we weren't ready.

I'd like to place my "broader sense" argument above the law. If the Supreme Court makes a law that is reactionary, isolationist, racist, or sexist, it will because we as a culture support that attitude. And if we don't, and they pass some wacky idea that does not reflect reality (like, say, prohibition), then their ruling will be overruled or ignored.

You are exactly right-- the shit could really hit the fan. I'm just saying that it's OUR shit. We own it. It's all over us already. If it hits the fan, GREAT! Let fire rain down upon us, let's have the struggles, the protests, and the riots that a Roe vs Wade overturn would bring (for example). We make our own fate. If we can't resolve how we feel about abortion, equal rights, or immigration as a nation, then we SHOULD have that kind of mayhem.

Energy and global warming is probably a better example. If we, as a nation, decide that what the oil companies have done is okay, then it will continue. If we decide we'd rather have solar power and alternative energy cars, then we'll have them. It won't matter who is in charge. We save ourselves, our politicians just reflect us.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]wej12
2008-09-11 09:02 pm UTC (link)
Saying "We make our own fate" and "It won't matter who is in charge" is a contradiction. Because of the Supreme Court's power over social, political and religious issues, and because justices are appointed by the president, we make our own fate by, not despite of, selecting whom we want to lead us.

Also, the Supreme Court often has made unpopular decisions that we as a country were not ready for, but that we grew to accept over time. There will be myriad examples of that in the years to come. What you propose -- allowing the "natural order of things" to prevail, to allow a roll-back to occur if that's the plan, or whatever -- is simply tyranny of the majority. In theory, and often in practice, that's what the high court is there to counter.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]beagley
2008-09-11 09:07 pm UTC (link)
Hmm. I definitely believe it DOES matter who is in charge. But believe that who is in charge is a reflection of who and what we are... sort of as a way of cheering myself up, honestly.

My brain is too fuzzy to keep going at the moment.

But I definitely disagree that we make our own fate by selecting whom we want to lead us. Our fate selection is far more involved and far more powerful than picking a guy to make the decisions. For most of the things in our lives, we have far more power than the law does. That power is so much greater, I argue, so as to render the law a dim chuckle in the night. I'd probably feel differently if I lived in 1984, but that's how I feel now.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…